patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Feds: Shorewood IT Guy Had Kiddie Porn Cache

Shorewood resident Christopher Kice was arrested Monday in connection with stockpiling child pornography, according to federal agents.

 

Federal agents took down a Shorewood man who they say amassed an extensive collection of child pornography.

Christopher Kice, 41, of 1110 Callaway Drive West, was carted down to the county jail Monday and then transported to federal custody in Chicago.

FBI agents armed with a warrant for Kice's arrest collared the information technology worker Monday.

According to a federal affidavit, Kice had numerous illicit computer files bearing such names as "Church Girls Gone Wild," "underage illegal preteen daughter," "pedofil," "lolitaguy," and others too filthy to print.

The feds and Shorewood cops raided Kice's home on St. Patrick's Day, the affidavit said.

Kice admitted to using his laptop computer to download pornography, according to the affidavit, which was penned by Special Agent Linda Engstrom, and he admitted to viewing child pornography "in the past," although not intentionally.

"Kice stated that if he unintentionally came across these images then he would delete them," the affidavit says. "Kice also stated that he knew people who had downloaded one child pornographic image and it had ruined their lives."

But a forensic examination of Kice's computers and computer equipment yielded pornographic images of young girls, the affidavit says. Some of the photographs were taken in Kice's home, according to the affidavit, and show the girls being fondled by the hand of an off-camera adult.

Among other images discovered in the investigation, the affidavit says, is a photograph "depicting a prepubescent girl, approximately six to eight years of age, receiving oral sex from a dog."

Kice's wife, Desiree Kice, did not want to discuss her husband's arrest.

"It has nothing to do with anybody. It's private," she said. "Chris didn't hurt anybody."

According to Kice's Facebook page, he was a photographer's mate in the Navy and has worked at Onward Technologies since June. He is also a fan of "Weird Al" Yankovic and the Cookie Monster.

A sign on the door of the Kice residence instructs visitors that a "Baby (is) sleeping. Please do not ring bell. Thanks."

Related Topics: Christopher Kice, Fbi, Jail, Police, Shorewood, and child pornography

joanna

7:35 pm on Tuesday, August 23, 2011

Sick pig! We live near this monster and I pray his children are removed from he and his wife's custody!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Bob and Mindy

9:45 pm on Thursday, August 25, 2011

People who make comments about his wife knowing about it piss me off! You obviously have no idea who or what you are talking about. Clearly they had nothing to hold him on in March or the FBI wouldn't allow him to continue living with his children. Neighbors do not have the right to know people's private business when things are only being investigated. Now that there is something to tell you know, but clearly you are only thinking about yourselves or you would be supporting this poor woman and her children instead of making these ridiculous accusations. She is just as much a victim than anyone else. You should be ashamed of yourselves. I would hate to have neighbors like that.

Comment_arrow

Bob and Mindy

9:49 pm on Thursday, August 25, 2011

And why would u want a 3 year old and a baby to be seperated from their innocent mother. She and her children are the victims here. So get your facts straight and STFU!! You have the right to talk about him, but u have no right to talk about the victims!!!!!!!!!!!

Comment_arrow

Ellen

10:01 pm on Thursday, August 25, 2011

I agree with Joanna. And, I'm not ashamed of myself for saying so.

I don't believe his wife didn't know what was going on - and, at the very least, she has shown that she is not capable of making decisions resulting in a safe environment for her children. She is defending him. That's not a victim.

Ray

8:41 am on Wednesday, August 24, 2011

When I read stuff like this it never ceases to amaze me. How sad. This man is one disturbed individual

Reply

Wendy

11:28 am on Wednesday, August 24, 2011

Why is ok to show the address on line where the poor woman is living? Doesn't she have enough to deal with? He is the accused, not her - or her children!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Ellen

10:04 pm on Thursday, August 25, 2011

It is ok to show the address because it is the place where a perv lives. She chose to live with a perv so that makes it her address too.

And why would Wendy think the address of a perv should not be shown?

Comment_arrow

Jordan

4:26 pm on Friday, August 26, 2011

Ellen, the reason Wendy thinks it is inappropriate for the address to be shown is because the "perv" is no longer in residence there. You are making a huge assumption that she knew about this to make it okay to blame her in the same manner.

Comment_arrow

Ellen

5:12 pm on Friday, August 26, 2011

Jordan.
Admittedly all I know of this case is what is in this one article. That said, disclosing an address where kiddie porn was created is not in and of itself blaming everyone living there. That also said, according to this article, she is defending him.

In these times it seems that everyone feels entitled to judge people without knowing much of anything about the case. So, I'm giving my opinion based on the little I know now. So, my opinion could change if more facts are brought to light.

But, if kiddie porn was created in that house, the whole world has the right to know the address.

joanna

12:41 pm on Wednesday, August 24, 2011

Showing the address was probably not a good idea, but I venture this woman had an idea what was going on especially since he was investigated back in March. My question is... Why in the world were us neighbors not notified to be in alert! There are ways to alert the neighborhood without giving any specifics! I am absolutely disgusted!

Reply

Larry

6:53 pm on Wednesday, August 24, 2011

"It's private...Chris didn't hurt anybody". To the contrary, the children subjected to having their picture taken, fondled and the action with the dog were undoubtedly affected, likely for life.

Reply

Ellen

1:59 pm on Thursday, August 25, 2011

While I believe they should throw the book at him for engaging in the creation and/or distribution of child pornography, I don't believe it should be illegal to download and posess it. I don't think it's anyone's business what you download.

And, no, FBI, I have never downloaded porn -- so, don't come a knocking.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Ellen

1:50 pm on Friday, August 26, 2011

Well, Sparky, I also believe that drugs should be legal and taxed.

Comment_arrow

Lucy

11:04 pm on Tuesday, August 30, 2011

Ewww. How can you think it's okay to posess this garbage? Little children are being expoited and violated and it's okay to have pictures of it? That is sad thinking. It's disgusting filth that should not even exist. So throw the book at him for making it but it's okay if the guy down the street has the pics?

Comment_arrow

Ellen

12:20 am on Wednesday, August 31, 2011

@ Lucy I didn't say that it was OK for him or anyone to have kiddie porn. I said it should not be illegal.

Kimberly

6:22 pm on Thursday, August 25, 2011

Really...the mom/wife had the nerve to say that "he hasn't hurt anybody"...wow! Makes me wonder what HER role in all of this was...because as a mom of 3 beautiful children, I would not be defending a man [married or not] who was arrested for kiddie porn! Just goes to show why you have to know where and with who your kids are with at ALL times!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Lucy

11:05 pm on Tuesday, August 30, 2011

Agreed. What kind of spouse doesn't know something like this is going on?

joanna

12:32 pm on Friday, August 26, 2011

Bob and Mindy! If in fact this happened in their home then yes, she us to blame as much as he! If u lived next to them then u would know that she never leaves the house and I believe it would be hard for this to happen in her home without her knowing! Yes they have been investigating since Mach but it was just now that the inspection proved it was done in his home! So this whole time these poor children have been put through who knows what! I am not sure about u but yes, when homes are being raided I think I have the right to be concerned for even my childrens safety! "her poor children" yes! Her being a victim? Um no not when she defends him! I think it's u that needs to get ur story straight! When ur neighbor gets picked up on kiddie porn then u can talk to me about what to say and what not to say about them!

Reply

Jordan

4:22 pm on Friday, August 26, 2011

Do you all honestly believe she just sat around knowing this was happening, especially with children in her home? Having known someone who had this same thing happen, I KNOW that is not likely the case. My friend was horrified & shocked when her husband was found doing the same thing. Trust me, when you've lived with someone for 20+ years & this comes out of the blue at you and your husband while being investigated keeps telling you "this is all a mistake, I didn't do this" and there is nothing in the past to make you doubt him and the feds don't remove him from the home meaning they don't believe him to be a danger to the children...what else is she supposed to think. You can't really imagine that she wants to think of her husband as being a pedofile. If they initially investigated him in March & are just getting around to filing charges that means for weeks now they haven't charged him, each week probably making her feel more & more secure that he was telling her the truth. The feds don't show their hand so she has no proof contrary to what he is telling her so that just makes it harder too. She is a victim just as much as the children are. As for her defending him...I doubt that is what she was doing. In fact, this news story has changed several times since it was first published obviously correcting "facts". She probably said "that 'they' didn't do anything wrong" meaning her & the children remaining in the home.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Lucy

11:08 pm on Tuesday, August 30, 2011

And there are also a lot of frail, obedient wives that let their husbands do whatever and don't say a word. He's filming in his home? Where is he getting the kids to do this? How can you be married to someone and not know they are doing this?

Ellen

5:28 pm on Friday, August 26, 2011

The fact that the feds didn't remove him from the home initially doesn't make him innocent - it just means they didn't have enough proof at that time.

I am the mother of three and I am just not buying that you could be married to someone like that and not suspect it. And, my children were more important to me than my husband so I would have been out of there so fast with my kids the minute I found out that he was even suspected.

We all have to make choices in life and apparently she chose to stay with him perhaps for the income, who knows, but she chose him over her children and that makes her very guilty in my book.

Reply

Bob and Mindy

5:33 pm on Friday, August 26, 2011

Thank you Jordan! I doubt anyone stating their opinions here has any idea how hard it would be to imagine their husband as a pedofile. Also, no matter how often you are home I doubt anyone knows EVERYTHING that happens in their home. Especially when its your husband taking care of the kids. Why would you question what he was doing when he was caring for them. There are no complaining victims here (IE the kids that live there have never said daddy hurt me) The article says they have reason to believe it was created there NOT that it was. Nothing has been proven yet. I sympathize that you are worried for your children, but he no longer lives there. You want to have your opinions based off a story that you have little knowledge of, fine, but you shouldn't start pointing your fingers until you have all the facts. The way you act towards this woman now can never be taken back. Didn't your mothers ever teach you that if you don't have anything nice to say don't say anything at all?!?!?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Ellen

9:37 pm on Friday, August 26, 2011

My mother taught me that and it was very bad advice. I think she got it from a cartoon rabbit.

Patch_comments_icon

Joseph Hosey

11:27 pm on Friday, August 26, 2011

Why did you change your name to "Tyler Durden" from "Ryan Whelan?" What are you afraid of, Ryan?

Reply

Jordan

12:16 am on Saturday, August 27, 2011

Exactly, we are all simply commenting on a story filled with vague "facts" that as I have pointed out previously, have changed from the original published story. It makes me sad that most of the comments seem to think the wife is as guilty/bad as the husband without any real reasoning as to why. The authors quote by her regarding "not hurting anyone" could be misquoted or taken out of context. It is apparent that only everywhere else in the USA can you be assured to be innocent until proven guilty, in Shorewood IL though you get to be judged by your neighbors without concrete facts & get the benefit of having lovely Joanna keep track of how many times you leave your home. Makes me want to move right out there...Not!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Ellen

7:17 pm on Saturday, August 27, 2011

It is only in a court of law that you are innocent until proven guilty. Outside of a courtroom, we judge people all the time.

Comment_arrow

Lucy

11:19 pm on Tuesday, August 30, 2011

So how is it that it's okay for you to speak your thoughts and feelings but anyone who comments differently than you, they are wrong? You have your opinion on the wife and then others have theirs. Like Ellen said, that whole innocent til proven guilty refers the the person when they are in the courtroom. We are allowed in the general public to have ideas or opinions, or even just questions about the situation. Some of us don't agree that a woman living with a guy like this, who was investigated earlier in the year as well, didn't know about it. That is all.

joanna

4:55 pm on Saturday, August 27, 2011

Well, the good thing is, is that I am entitled to my opinion as u are entitled to yours! I am pretty sure if something like this was happening at your neighbors house you would be well aware as well! You see that's what they call a neighborhood watch program! It's neighbors being aware of the people living in their neighborhood, where their children play! U may all think what u may of me, but I am entitled to my opinion of this family and may state it at any time! Just as all of u have stated yours! U may think I'm bad for saying she knew about it and I may think your bad for defending her! The point is we may both have our own opinion and others will have theirs also!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jordan

2:45 pm on Sunday, August 28, 2011

You are right Joanna, you are entitled to your opinion. I had just asked you to have an open mind. Other, more credible news sources have carried this story & none of them have said that they have determined that pornography was created in the home & none of them felt the need to give the actual house address. According to the FBI blog, they have already investigated the wife & found she did not participate or know about what was going on. Not surprising since it took 5 months for trained proffessionals to find evidence without having two young children to look after. They also state that they would be doing door by door visits to the neighbors to find out what the neighbors knew & to let the know the wife had been cleared & to stop harrassing her. Seems that some of the neighbors felt it necessary to vandalise/deface the woman's home by throwing rocks & eggs at it...funny how the writer of this article hasn't updated the information about that instead of possibly inaccurate & sensational accusations that are bound to turn neighbors irate.

Ellen

6:26 pm on Sunday, August 28, 2011

Jordan, If there are other, better news reports about this, why not provide some links for us?

Reply

joanna

9:22 pm on Sunday, August 28, 2011

Jordan, I do not agree with what happened to her home! I think it makes the rest if the neighborhood look bad! However as someone else stated I do find it hard to believe that she had no idea what her husband was up to. Not that I think she did it or had part in it but I think she may have had a feeling and turned an eye. In my book defending him is just as bad! I am not one to run her out of the neighborhood but u can bet I won't be baking her brownies!

Reply
Patch_comments_icon

Joseph Hosey

11:37 pm on Sunday, August 28, 2011

Jordan, you're either stupid, a liar, or both. Here is a link to a PDF of the FBI affidavit: http://206.18.146.25/rfcViewFile/11cr563.pdf. It's graphic and disturbing, so don't read it it's going to bother you. If you do read it and find it offensive, don't blame me. The feds put it up on a public website for anyone to see. I'm just passing it along. But as far as these credible news outlets and what they don't report, check out pages six and seven, then tell me if they're credible because they leave out facts about your friends you'd rather not acknowledge.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mom of 2

7:35 am on Wednesday, August 31, 2011

I just went to that link and read the report. I literally feel like throwing up.

Jordan

12:42 am on Monday, August 29, 2011

OK, I've finally got to read the actual filed crimnal complaint & it does look like they believe that he may have created pornography in the home which is horrific, especially since it seems that it includes a family member. That does not make me stupid or a liar in stating the facts that there are other news media's out there that did not give the full address or state empathically that pornography HAD been created in the home, even the Fed's haven't charged him with creating pornography. You have also sensationalized your story by adding in the tid bit about the girl with the dog, making it seem like that also happened in the home when that is not inferred at all in the complaint. I will find the FBI blog regarding the wife & family being cleared & the FBI/local police doing the canvass regarding her innocence & post the link for you. That is where I had also read about the neighbors harrassing her & defacing her home, something Joanna has already confirmed did happen.

Reply

Jordan

9:41 am on Monday, August 29, 2011

http://www.fbi.gov/chicago/press-releases/2011/shorewood-man-arrested-for-possession-of-child-pornography

Here is one of the FBI links regarding the story, in the FBI’s own link they say that he has only been arrested for possession, NOT for creating it as it has not yet been determined if that is the case. In fact, they write: “Investigators recognized the background on these images, indicating that they might have been taken inside KICE’s residence. This discovery led investigators to arrest KICE that same evening.”

Granted, regardless of the wording, it sounds very bad for Mr. Kice but I’ve never defended him. My concern is for the victims left behind in the home who could be harmed or ridiculed for inaccurate or misleading information. It is written in this article that, “Kice’s wife did not want to discuss her husband’s arrest.”; yet this is directly followed by a quote by her. I’d like to know the context of her comment & if it is accurate (do you have a .wav file or something similar from your conversation with her?). The poor choice of wording may have unintentional by a woman being harassed by reporters after her life has been shattered.

Reply
Patch_comments_icon

Joseph Hosey

9:55 am on Monday, August 29, 2011

Jordan, nothing was taken out of context. No one was misquoted. Nothing was poorly worded. The article was not vague. It was not sensationalized. It does not lack credibility. Whether you want to acknowledge it or not, your friend's husband has been accused of possessing child pornography. And according to the FBI affidavit, he was also creating it himself, in his own home, and victimizing two young girls. The FBI could be wrong about this, or they might have fabricated these accusations for some sinister reason. I guess we'll find out. In the meantime, please stop posting foolishness and lies. And by the way, where's that link to your "FBI blog?"

Reply
Comment_arrow

Eunoia

4:22 pm on Monday, August 29, 2011

Seems like you make a living feeding off other peoples misery & misfortunes - pathetic salacious reporting -

Comment_arrow

Ellen

5:31 pm on Monday, August 29, 2011

@ Eunoia -- And, yet, one would have to assume that you read the entire "salacious report" before making your comment.

So, why are you reading stories like this if that's the way you feel???

Jordan

9:56 am on Monday, August 29, 2011

Her neighbor Joanna says she can’t imagine the wife didn’t know anything about her husband’s attraction to and possible creation of child pornography because “she never leaves the house”. The stories I’ve read are saying this wife has a young child under the age of 1…unless she had a home birth I would assume that would include multiple visits to her OB/GYN, and a trip to the hospital for 1-2 days for a normal birth, 5 days to 2 weeks for a c-section or complicated birth during which time I would assume the other child would be under the care of her father for at least part of that time. Why would she question her child being in his care? Also, why would you question your husband being on the computer a lot, especially with him being an IT professional…its his job? I just worry that this poor woman is being held responsible for his actions & being treated like crap by her neighbors. I will still find the write up on a separate FBI blog regarding the wife’s innocence & the door to door visits. As a victim advocate, that is what is my priority concern.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Lucy

11:31 pm on Tuesday, August 30, 2011

So when he was found out by his coworkers back in March to be downloading at work, then they investigated his home, his wife wasn't informed why they were searching? I just find it hard to believe that a wife doesn't know her husband is creepy like this. It just sounds like she doesn't interact with him much or something.

Jordan

10:25 am on Monday, August 29, 2011

How am I posting lies? Mr. Hosey, I did not say that the poor choice of wording was your doing, I said, "The poor choice of wording may have unintentional by a woman being harassed by reporters after her life has been shattered." That is not putting the blame on you if indeed that is what was said, I don't know, I wasn't there. I also said that I wasn't defending Mr. Kice; only the people who are victims in the house, the wife & children. Too often they are blamed for actions of others that they knew nothing about. You also say he was victimizing two young girls in his home, the affiavit does not say that the image of the girl with the dog was in the home, in fact, it is in a seperate paragraph indicating "other images" found include the image of the girl with the dog.

Reply

Lori Janiec

10:36 am on Monday, August 29, 2011

I have been reading this thread since the original article posted and have been reading the volley of comments since.

It is a sad commentary to our society these days, even tho this type of child abuse has been going on since before technology made it more accessible.

I shudder to think of how the parents of young children who live on or near his block feel about this and worse, the parents of the two young girls depicted in his HOME pictures. I'm sure there are a couple of father's who are trying very hard NOT to commit murder.

I just hope he gets his conviction and gets registered. I for one will be watching the FAMILY WATCH DOG site for his name when he's released...

Reply
Patch_comments_icon

Joseph Hosey

4:56 pm on Monday, August 29, 2011

Maybe, Eunoia — but it's a lot better than collecting child pornography!

Reply

Ellen

5:24 pm on Monday, August 29, 2011

The wife may be determined to be not guilty but that is not the same as being innocent. It just means they either have nothing or not enough to charge her with.

But she is not innocent because, as a mother, it is her job to know what is going on in her house. She failed to keep her children safe from a perv. You don't get to make excuses for failing at that. This is not an innocent woman.

Reply

joanna

8:25 pm on Monday, August 29, 2011

Ellen, well said! I agree 100% ! I don't know what is wrong with these people believing she us a victim! The only victim is her children!

Reply

Lr

10:11 am on Wednesday, August 31, 2011

As far as the Kice's, the police are handling it just fine. We will probably never see him again and she'll be gone too. Our kids are in no danger from them.

Regarding the cowardly egg attack on the Kice's home; this was brought on by a neighbor mom who recruited her own children along with the outcast children from two other families. It was witnessed by the rest of the neighbors and children surrounding the Kice's home. The children were asked to join in on the "fun" and the parents in attendance quickly stopped them. An attempt was made to stop the rest of the vandals by phone, however the bullying to Mrs. Kice and her innocent children went as planned. Shorewood police, county, and FBI have been out to interview. So far I am not aware of any action.

I am not a friend of Kice. I did not, like other neighbors, know their names until I read it in the paper. I understand the emotion from the parents, but what have these adult provoked BULLY kids learned? These "vigilante heros" need their 15 minutes of fame too.

Reply

John Schrock

7:44 am on Monday, September 5, 2011

Don't be naive, it is a proven fact, the wife always knows.

Reply
Comment_arrow
Patch_comments_icon

Joseph Hosey

9:34 pm on Monday, September 5, 2011

I think we should have a blog on this.

Leave a comment