patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!
Local Voices
Attorney At Law

I am the Victim of Police Brutality, why am I Charged With Resisting Arrest?

I often consult with clients who claim to be the victims of police brutality and are charged with resisting arrest and or aggravated battery to a police officer. They usually believe they have a claim against the police officers which we can immediately file and pursue to a settlement.

While they may or may not have viable claim and lawsuit against the arresting officers, they have to be cleared of the criminal charges before the civil suit can proceed. Why would this be the case?

The first reason has to do with fact that anything said by the client in the civil suit could be used against the client in the criminal case. There is a judicial policy which requires that the civil suit be stayed until the criminal case is resolved.

The second reason has to do with the fact a conviction on the criminal charges precludes any civil suit. Let's be real, if the client was the victim of police wrongdoing, the police charged the client in an attempt to avoid civil liability. The police have nothing to loose by filing questionable charges. If the client is incarcerated, there is often a strong inclination to plea bargain, a plea for freedom. Because the criminal case is a judicial finding, it has what lawyers call Res Judicata effect. This means that the facts which support the criminal conviction are binding on the client in the civil lawsuit. This almost universally means that there can be no civil suit as a finding that the client hit the cop or resisted arrest means that the cop could use force (even excessive) against the client.

The reality is that this is they way the game is played. The states attorney's office has clients, the police officers who bring the charges. If the prosecutors can help their "clients" out, they have no problem filing the charges. The police officers look out for each other and know how to write self serving reports. Sometimes they can actually win these type of cases. What makes the game interesting is when there are witnesses to the incident or video.

There are few things more rewarding as an attorney as cross examining a police officer with a video that contradicts his report. The answer to the question posed is a result of human nature. Before a citizen can go about suing the police for getting beat up, the citizen has to play the game. Other civil litigants, such as someone injured in an auto accident, do not have to undergo a criminal prosecution in order to pursue the claim. Welcome to my world.

Flora Dora

12:09 pm on Saturday, February 11, 2012

In any case I would call John Schrock!

Reply

milanastray

3:06 pm on Friday, February 17, 2012

I'm not a lawyer like this guy ... nor do I play one on television. But this business about the upcoming mandatory gay marriage legislation in Illinois that I read about on the Internet has raised some concerns, both legal and otherwise.
First, how can this even be legal? I mean c'mon, I guess it's OK between two consenting adults, but now the government tells me I have to be married to some one of the same sex. That just doesn't seem right.
First off, I'm already married to a person of the opposite sex. What am I supposed to tell them?
Next, what about kids? I mean without the reproduction process, I guess everyone will have to adopt from now on. But jeez, how long will that last? I mean there's only so many Chinese babies to adopt and last I heard they cost like $30 grand apiece. Plus they're all girls. African kids? Forget about it. Angelina Jolie and Madonna have already snapped up all the good ones.
If they pass this law, I will do something drastic. Like move to Indiana.

Reply

John Schrock

7:50 am on Monday, February 20, 2012

They already passes the law. It allows people of the same sex to marry.

Reply

Leave a comment