.
News Alert
Truck Driver Charged In I-55 Crash That Killed 4

Blog: Is This Group Pro-Life or Anti-Child?

Abortion is not the issue. Children are the issue.

There are a few things that make my blood boil faster than a conduction cook top can ready a pot for a bag of rice. The top of the list is anything involving harm to a child. Yeah, I know, controversial stuff there.

However, my anything list also includes those issues that one would not necessarily see as a child endangerment, neglect or abuse issue, such as abortion.

This Friday, the Pro-Life Action League will be in Joliet, Shorewood and Plainfield at busy intersections. They call these campaigns “Face the Truth Tours” and stage them all around the country. They are proud to say this will be the seventh year they are holding this event in the area, and are calling for more volunteers to help hold up signs for passing motorists to view.

I believe it was the first year they were out and about locally that I encountered them and their incredibly graphic and as large as six foot tall signs depicting pictures of aborted fetuses. I was infuriated, as I had my child in the car with me, who got a better view of the signs as I was distracted by the task of driving.

This year, the Patch has published their itinerary, so parents who have in the past complained about their children being exposed to these disturbing images can avoid the intersections and roads where they will be set up. However, the group's website states it doesn’t believe there is any real harm done to a child who may see these images.

Really? I find that answer both appalling and hypocritical.There are ratings for what images children can be exposed to in movies and video games, ratings religious groups are quick to say do not go nearly far enough. This group is also religiously based and this whistle stop tour of the area will include a luncheon at a local Catholic church.

These are among the first people to object to what they consider pornography and graphic violence being allowed to be seen by children. Yet, when it suits their purposes, not only are graphic and disturbing images acceptable, they consider it a potential teachable moment. Their website even claims that exposing children to these graphic and disturbing images may help them by sparing them the grave harm of involvement in a future abortion.

I am not a supporter of abortion as a contraceptive. I find it unspeakably sad, and I feel bad for women who even have to think of it as an option. I also accept the fact and happen to agree that it is a woman’s right, spiritually, morally and legally. Having been raised as a Catholic and a Christian, most of the values I hold in life were formed in that crucible of faith and religious dogma. I guess I hold some parts of my religious upbringing more sacred than others who ostensibly share my faith. I am referring to what I see as the most basic tenets of all, the concepts of free will and to love another as you would love yourself.

It is because of these beliefs that I am sickened by the idea of forcing anyone’s religion on others, especially when those basic values are violated and twisted to further an agenda.It is a woman's right to do what she wills with her body and her soul; it is our duty as Catholics and Christians to allow her that right just as we allow ourselves that right.

What I find equally offensive is this group and others like it calling themselves “Pro-Life”. They say they are defending the rights of the unborn. I say they do this at the expense of the already born, whether that be a child or a woman. They are only for life if they can control that life according to their religiously based definition.

They say human life begins at conception, yet that definition can only be supported with faith based arguments. Even a rudimentary understanding of the process by which a sperm and an egg become a human being recognizes the fact that there are stages of development. It is not until very late in pregnancy that the brain develops enough to be capable of human consciousness.

It is scientific fact that the human brain consists of three primary parts that develop at different stages, and until that third stage is achieved, human thought, emotion and intelligence are simply not possible. They respond this scientific analysis doesn’t address the human soul. I agree, but I also say the mere existence of the soul is a matter of faith and religion.

I will never agree to take away a woman’s right to choose what to do with her body, at least not legally. However, my disgust and fight against these groups may soften when there are no more children who are hungry, homeless, unwanted, abused or neglected; when orphanages and the foster-care system become an anomaly; when there are no more children starving for love, care, a safe place to sleep and regular meals. Then I will be willing to address those who carelessly become pregnant and think of abortion as just another birth control method.

Even then, I still won’t support the idea that all abortion is wrong. I will also never support the idea that someone, anyone, but particularly the government, has the right to tell a woman what she can and cannot do with her body. As a woman, I find this the most insulting and degrading idea around today. Limiting a woman’s right to choose what to do with her body is to ignore her humanity and reduce her to the status of a brood mare.

The debate on abortion itself is actually secondary in my objection to this and other groups. My first and primary objection is simply a matter of priorities.

In their zeal to overturn the law of the land legalizing a woman’s right to choose, they ignore, side-step and downplay the cost their agenda exacts on the unwanted children who are already here. Just within the Catholic church, how many programs that directly help and support children are underfunded or simply cancelled due to lack of funding? How many schools have been closed? How many outreach services no longer function due to tightening of the fiscal belt?

It has never been done to my knowledge, but I’d like to see an accounting of the untold millions of dollars spent on what these groups call the rights of the unborn. I simply can’t wrap my head around the idea that these people of faith don’t see how that money would care for and change the future of the millions of unwanted children already in this world. If nothing else, I would think they would see how devoting their time, talent and treasure to these, the least of their brethren is exactly what Jesus said we are all to do.

This is the truth I’d like to see these people face.

This post is contributed by a community member. The views expressed in this blog are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Patch Media Corporation. Everyone is welcome to submit a post to Patch. If you'd like to post a blog, go here to get started.

Logansdad July 13, 2012 at 03:44 PM
The morning after pill prevents implantation which happens at 3 weeks. So how is taking the morning after pill any different than having an abortion at 3 weeks? You are at the exact same stage in the development process and both methods accomplish the exact same thing. How can you say one is bad and the other is not?
justme July 13, 2012 at 04:21 PM
@Logansdad - will you please get educated! The morning after pill is effective 5 days after unprotected sex. NOT 3 WEEKS. And it IS NOT AN ABORTION. It stops the mothers ovaries from releasing an egg. To read more about it go here: http://www.plannedparenthood.org/health-topics/emergency-contraception-morning-after-pill-4363.asp And this pill is available over the counter. So yes, there are ways to stop a pregancy before it turns into a life.
Logansdad July 13, 2012 at 04:33 PM
I am sorry but you fail to understand how the morning after pill works. Yes it is taken after sex to prevent pregnancy. It works by stoping implentation. You even said this. Fertilizaion occurs by week 2. Implantation occurs by week 3. That information is taken from http://www.babycenter.com/fetal-development-week-by-week. So if taking a pill stops implentation which occurs in week three, what is the difference if a women has an abortion during week 2-3. I also find it ironic that you use a refernce from Planned Parenthood as support. Planned Parenthood - the same place place pregnant women go to when seeking information about abortion. And the morning after pill is not always effective in stopping unwanted pregnancies either.
justme July 18, 2012 at 08:50 PM
@ Logansdad. I also said I was incorrect about the way the morning after pill works. Please read the link I provided to see how it truly works - it stops the egg from being released. My point is, there are many ways to stop a pregnancy before it happens. That is where the choice and responsibility lies. After that, it is terminating a life - no matter small or insignificant anyone thinks that life is.
Logansdad July 18, 2012 at 09:03 PM
"That is where the choice and responsibility lies." Those should be left up to the woman. There are times where it is more responsible to prevent life. Speaking of which. There is no difference is preventing life by taking a pill to prevent a pregancy right after sex and having a proceedure at 2-3 weeks along. The morning after pill is not always effective and there are disagreements about how the pill works: "Based on the belief that a fertilized egg is a person, some religious groups and conservative politicians say disrupting a fertilized egg’s ability to attach to the uterus is abortion, “the moral equivalent of homicide,” " You believe it works at form of contraception in order to conform to your beliefs about abortion. That is fine. If at 2-3 weeks, the morning after pill does the same thing that an abortion accomplishes, why is one right and the other wrong? Both women are taking responsibility to prevent a pregancy.

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »