.
Feedback

After Three Years, Is Drew Peterson Checking Out of Jail?

One way or the other, whether he's going to prison or back home, it looks like Drew Peterson won't mark a fourth year in the Will County jail.

Three years ago today, a small army of police descended on Drew Peterson as he drove away from his Bolingbrook home, and a small army of media was there to record it.

Three years later, the press is back, as the attention-starved Peterson was recently in court for the first time in nearly a year and a half. Peterson may have appreciated the coverage, but unfortunately for him, the disgraced former cop was still stuck in jail waiting on his murder trial to finally start.

The good news for Peterson, 58, is he likely won’t be spending another year in segregation in the Will County jail. His trial on charges he murdered his third wife, Kathleen Savio, is all but certain to begin before the year is out, ending a lengthy legal saga of appeals and arguments over the legitimacy of hearsay evidence.

During Peterson’s latest court hearing a mere three days ago, the accused wife-killer looked noticeably older. His hair has gone whiter since the day he was arrested, his face now gaunt behind the beard he let grow out.

But his appearance aside, Peterson is doing great in jail. At least according to one of his five attorneys, Joel Brodsky.

“Drew is happy that he can see the light at the end of the tunnel,” said Brodsky.

But that light might still be a good three months down the tunnel, and possibly even farther off than that, from what Peterson’s legal team was saying last week. Will County State’s Attorney James Glasgow, on the other hand, maintained that prosecutors were prepared to go to trial immediately.

“Ready to go,” Glasgow said.

So , Peterson’s murder case has gone from limbo to the apparent fast track. At least one relative of his slain third wife has expressed relief that Savio’s case will find closure. But the mystery surrounding the fate of Peterson’s missing fourth wife, Stacy Peterson, remains no less murky this May 7 than on any May 7 in the previous four years.

It was the , who would be 28 if she is still alive, that motivated the state police to re-examine Savio’s March 2004 death and ultimately charge Drew Peterson with murder.

At the time she went missing, however, the state police were quick to call Stacy Peterson the victim of a “potential homicide” and to name her much older husband the sole suspect in their investigation. That was more than four years ago, and they have yet to arrest the sole suspect, or anyone else, in connection with the Stacy Peterson case.

Master Sgt. Tom Burek, a spokesman for the state police, said the increased media scrutiny sparked by activity in the Savio prosecution precluded him from releasing information on what is going on with the Stacy Peterson case, but he insisted that things were in fact going on.

“The investigation is still active and continues to move forward,” Burek said.

Burek also said unidentified human remains found in Hodgkins near the Stevenson Expressway and LaGrange Road last month are “unrelated to our investigation.”

Whether the Stacy Peterson case ever makes it from active investigation to active prosecution is impossible to determine. But the once-accidental death of Kathleen Savio looks like it will be presented to a jury as a murder case between three and four years after her husband was jailed on charges that he killed her.

Asked about this stretch his client has already spent behind bars, another Peterson attorney, Joseph “Shark” Lopez, said, “Well, that’s a long time for doing nothing.”

Watchful Eye May 12, 2012 at 06:56 pm
Moreli, this is silly. Talk to the hand. You are somethin' else.
Watchful Eye May 12, 2012 at 07:05 pm
Ha! Moreli, Tom wasn't interviewed at the time of his mother's death either. Now, he's the defense's alibi witness for his father. He was propped up on a sofa on national tv and said he highly doubted his father killed his mother, and he was with them the whole time.
Damn, I wish he would have written that down, because he may not be correct in his observations. Ya think?
John Moreli May 12, 2012 at 07:16 pm
So all of that will put doubt in the juries mind! Who can you believe and can't believe!
John Moreli May 12, 2012 at 07:19 pm
Watchful eye if the lead investigator of Savio botched her death investigation , I doubt then he did a through interview process of all the people in the house or wrote it down!
Joseph Hosey (Editor) May 12, 2012 at 08:00 pm
Watchful Eye, why do you waste time on this guy? And after reading what he has to say, I really do believe he was a Bolingbrook cop. I wonder if he used his super "investigative skills" on the Rachel Mellon case. Ha ha ha.
John Moreli May 12, 2012 at 08:20 pm
Nope. I'm a typical newspaper reporter!
John Moreli May 12, 2012 at 08:24 pm
The Rachel Mellon case was thoroughly investigated by B.P.D. Investigators , but lack of physical evidence prevented any arrest! Murder never goes away!
Watchful Eye May 12, 2012 at 08:59 pm
JH - Done wasting my time. He just wants to argue. I believe he is or was a cop too. One that is sympathetic to Peterson. Not all cops are!
tom May 12, 2012 at 09:02 pm
John Moreli,
What crime do you consider to be worse than murder?
tom May 12, 2012 at 09:12 pm
I also think that this is the new alias for Tom Selleck since he was blocked from posting on the Patch.
John Moreli May 12, 2012 at 09:23 pm
Sorry you feel that way watchful eye, I have a right to my opinoins about Drew just as you do! Bet I forgot your opinions are golden and you have Drew convicted already. Also watchful eye you would be very surprised on how many Detectives, Police Officers, other Law Enforcement and lawyers I've have spoken with throughout Illinois and even a couple of States , who think the Peterson case is a sham and they are sympathic as you say I am.
John Moreli May 12, 2012 at 09:36 pm
Tom keep thinking that and toking up will do that to one's mind!
Watchful Eye May 12, 2012 at 09:40 pm
Yeah, Tom, I think so too.
Joseph Hosey (Editor) May 12, 2012 at 09:44 pm
Of course that has nothing to do with the investigators who were supposed to find the physical evidence. Or that they waited a day before trying, even though the mother told me she begged officers to look for her daughter. Maybe you should have volunteered your "investigative skills."
Mother Hen May 12, 2012 at 10:46 pm
You boys need to get some air and take a break from your silly bickering.
Freddie Kissell May 13, 2012 at 12:49 am
I agree, Mother Hen. WTF is with the nutty, manic postings by Moreli? Toking up? Nevermind the liberal use of exclamation points. Jeez, take it easy, copper.
John Moreli May 13, 2012 at 01:53 am
Mrs. Mellon should just ask her husband where Rachel is buried! Case solved!
Eye in the sky May 14, 2012 at 03:44 am
Blue barrel.
John Moreli May 14, 2012 at 06:17 pm
Freddie you talk so tough behind a keyboard ! Myob!!!
Watchful Eye May 14, 2012 at 07:35 pm
Moreli, you're like the playground big mouth and bully. It's your way or no way. If you can't win an argument, you repeat yourself over and over until we're all sick of you.
You can have the floor. You earned it with your mindless preaching, cop knowledge and just plain b.s.
Eye in the sky May 14, 2012 at 08:54 pm
Where's the barrel?
John Moreli May 15, 2012 at 12:48 pm
Don't like it watchful eye move on little boy!
John Moreli May 15, 2012 at 12:51 pm
By the way watchful eye are your comments gospel and am i supposed to go with your way of thinking . Like I said a few times show me your expertise in law enforcement or related field.
Watchful Eye May 15, 2012 at 01:36 pm
Yes sir! Thank you, sir.
John Moreli May 15, 2012 at 01:38 pm
Good little boy.
Watchful Eye May 15, 2012 at 09:08 pm
Ha. The War's over, Moreli. You can get parts for your head now.
John Moreli May 15, 2012 at 11:14 pm
Tsk Tsk! How old are we? Wouldnt use your head , I would only find a pea!
Cece Love May 24, 2012 at 03:08 am
Look, he isn't going to come clean until there is certain evidence that he did kill his ex-wives. I can't believe that it took that long to get him in jail. He's guilty. By his actions, that we did get on camera, his behavior is odd for someone who found out his third and fourth ex-wives were dead.
Watchful Eye May 24, 2012 at 02:27 pm
What's really creepy about Peterson, IMO, is that he became quite cocky after slipping through the fingers of LE regarding the death of his ex-wife. If he did, in fact, kill her, he got away with it for years. It was only after mystery surrounded the disappearance of his young wife that it brought attention to Kathleen's death. There were no cameras, tv, radio, and print media to question and follow him around when Kathleen died, like thee was when Stacy disappeared. He brought this all on himself, with more than enough help from his lead lawyer, and made himself the goon people think he is.
Lucky for him that even though he "looks" like he's guilty to a whole lot of people, it won't be enough to convict him. Hopefully, there's enough evidence and testimony to put him at Kathleen's house during the time frame of her death, along with powerful, damning circumstantial evidence, if he's going to be convicted of killing her. For all the blubbering his attorneys do about hearsay testimony, they sure seem to be afraid of it, even after calling it worthless and useless. Hmmmm.
KO May 28, 2012 at 03:42 am
R u 2 done?

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Shorewood Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
9" Caramel Toffee Crunch
Bonnie Truckenbrodt Neal June 6, 2013 at 09:08 am
We have tried this cheesecake and it is one of the best we have ever had. We liked it so much thatRead More we bought one and traveled 8 hours in the car to our home. It was the highlight of Christmas dinner. White Chocolate Raspberry...yummy